Why is Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare 3 the same game and why do they suck?

I didn't last 5 minutes on Battlefield 3. So it looks really really good (because that's all that matters right?!?!) and you have this revolutionary new setting which is fighting sand ******* in the middle east. But I just don't understand how it's any different from MW3.|||but its so awesum!!1 its totaly new seting for each and their both in the desert. mw3 is beter then bf3 becaus of its good multiplair!1!|||Battlefield 3's single-player campaign is pretty much a copycat of Modern Warfare. The multiplayer components, on the other hand, is a different story altogether.



The Battlefield series has never been known for its single-player game, if any. Nobody knows why they made it such a big deal.



edit: But yes, before I forget. *Facepalm* Maybe you'll like it better if you're fighting Jews, Antisemite?|||There not the same game but they are kind of similar, and they don't suck but they might to you, anyway what dumbass kind of question is this?|||If you want a more tatical and strategic game go with Battlefield 3.





http://battlefield3strategyguide22.blogs鈥?/a>





Or If you want the best Multiplayer experience and great gameplay then go with MF3





http://modernwarfare3strategyguide1.blog鈥?/a>|||THEY ARE NOT THE SAME GAME YOU IDIOT. YOU CANT FLY A JET IN MODERN WARFARE AND THERE ARRENT AS MANY GOOD TACTICS ON THE MP. GET YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR BUTT YOU IDIOT!!!|||Because the graphics are actually good, it doesn't give you motion sickness and the sounds don't make your ears bleed?|||*facepalm*





Use of racial slurs don't help your argument.|||wow racist much!! But to answer your question the only people who know how to make games anymore is Bethesda! Get Skyrim!!! and do not be so ignorant!